自己的总结+七宗罪之展开
The argument that blabla omits some important concerns that must be addressed to substantiate the argument. The statement that follows the description of blabla simply describes what blabla will do. This alone does not constitude a logical argument in favor of blabla, and it certainly does not provide support or proof of the main argument.
超好听的日文歌Most conspicuously, the argument does not address the cause of the problem of blabla, the use of blabla, or who is involved in the blabla.
First, the argument assumes that the cause of the problem is that the A , the B, and the C are unknown. In a weak attempt to support its claim, the argument describes blabla that makes all of these things accurately known. But if the cause of the problem of blabla is that A, blabla will not solve the problem. Second, the argument never address A and how this will affect blabla’s objective of doing blabla. If A , blabla will not be avoided. Finally, if C, the problem of blabla cannot be solved by blabla. The argument also does not address what would happen in the event that D.
Because the argument leaves out several key issues, it is not sound or persuasive. If it 苏州是哪个省incl
uded the items discussed above instead of solely explaining 国家奖学金申请书what blabla supposed does, the argument would have been more thorough and convincing.
开头
1、 先陈述作者是如何通过某fact来argue了一个conclusion（这步可分为两句，第一句讲作者得出了什么conclusion——in this argument, the author makes a conclusion that……第二句写第一个fact——to justify this conclusion, the author points out that……）
2、 作者用什么去支持了这个conclusion（第二个fact）
3、 还有什么其他的fact是couple with上面的support的（第三个fact）
4、 指出作者的argument是unconvincing的，有几点critical flaws。
Citing facts drawn from the color-film processing industry that indicate a downward trend in the costs of film processing over a 24-year period, the author argues that Olympic Foods will likewise be able to minimize costs and thus maximize profits in the future.  In s
upport of this conclusion the author cites the general principle that “as organizations learn how to do things better, they become more efficient.”  This principle, coupled with the fact that Olympic Foods has had 25 years of experience in the food processing industry leads to the author’s rosy prediction. Although the argument seems plausible, it is unconvincing because it suffers from two critical flaws.
结尾
1、 总结说作者的argument是不够compelling的
2、 为了加强结论作者应该提供哪些evidence（与主体段一致、有几个flaw就写几句）
In conclusion, despite that fact that this argument seems appealing, it has several logical flaws, and is therefore unpersuasive as it stands. To strengthen the conclusion that Olympic Foods will enjoy minimal costs and maximum profits in the future, the author would have to provide evidence that the company has learned how to do things better as a result of its 25 years of experience. Supporting examples drawn from industries more si
milar to the food-processing industry would further substantiate the author’s view. To better support this argument, the arguer should also provide…
七宗罪每一宗该如何展开
踏青诗句无端假设
例1
First, the author’s forecast of minimal costs and maximum profits rests on the gratuitous assumption that Olympic Foods’ “long experience” has taught it how to do things better. There is, however, no guarantee that this is the case. Nor does the author cite any evidence to support this assumption. Just as likely文竹叶子发黄怎么办很可能, Olympic Foods has learned nothing from its 25 years in the food-processing business. Lacking this assumption, the expectation of increased efficiency is entirely unfounded.
例2
Moreover, the argument rests on a unconvincing assumption that “long experience” leads to “learn how to do things better” for the reason that there is no evidence given to substantiate the claim that experience contributes to the performance of a company. (除了调查，原题一定会给一个其他的逻辑A－B这样的非充分必要条件，本段的攻击就是针对其展开) Even if it is true that…the mere fact that(指向原题的条件) does not necessarily indicate that(原题结论). It is entirely possible that(注意，本次可能性列举是就原题条件列举，上段的列举是就结论列举，完全不同，一个是反证，一个是归谬。请大家注意)..Or perhaps….（这段列举我不建议超过2个，因为太多的列举会显得逻辑性不强。2个就够了）
Thus, given these possible scenarios情境, the fact(原题的条件) prove nothing about (原题结论)
本段小结，所有的题目也都会出现这样的错误，也就是说，无论在原题没有调查研究这样的题目中，模版中的3.4段都应该出现，并且绝对是你的主要攻击火力。
上海景点错误类比
例1
Second, it is highly doubtful that the facts drawn from the color-film processing industry are applicable to the food processing industry. Differences between the two industries clearly outweigh the similarities, thus making the analogy highly less than valid. For example, problems of spoilage, contamination, and timely transportation all affect the food industry but are virtually absent in the film-processing industry. Problems such as these might present insurmountable不能克服的 obstacles that prevent lowering food-processing costs in the future.

版权声明：本站内容均来自互联网，仅供演示用，请勿用于商业和其他非法用途。如果侵犯了您的权益请与我们联系QQ:729038198，我们将在24小时内删除。